In 2025, compliance is no longer a nice-to-have. It is a core requirement for closing deals, entering new markets, and proving to enterprise buyers that your startup can be trusted with sensitive data. Whether you are chasing SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR alignment, or multi-framework compliance, the pressure to get things right has never been greater.
This is why tools like Vanta, Drata, and ISMS.online dominate the conversation in every security, engineering, and founder community. They promise automation, simplicity, guidance, and speed. But behind the marketing headlines, each platform is drastically different in how it works, who it serves, and what it can help your business achieve.
Choosing the wrong one can lock your team into months of rework, expensive add-ons, and frustration when you realize your compliance tool cannot support the frameworks or workflows your business needs.
This is the most complete, reality-based comparison of Vanta, Drata, and ISMS.online for 2025, written for startups and scaling companies that need clarity, not fluff.
The compliance starter pack
Built for speed with simple workflows for fast-growing startups
The automation powerhouse
Deep automation and precision for technical teams
The governance-first solution
Gold standard for documentation-heavy ISO 27001 programs
Vanta is the most recognizable name in automated SOC 2. It built its reputation by promising the one thing founders desperately want: speed. Setup is quick, dashboards look clean, and the entire platform is designed for teams with little or no prior compliance experience.
Where Vanta shines
Where Vanta falls short
Vanta is ideal for early-stage teams needing fast SOC 2, but its limitations appear as companies scale.
Drata takes a different approach. Rather than focusing on simplicity, it focuses on automation depth. Engineering teams prefer Drata because it integrates deeply into cloud and identity systems and provides far more granular validation.
Where Drata shines
Where Drata struggles
Drata is built for companies that take compliance seriously and want to scale into many frameworks, not just SOC 2.
ISMS.online does not try to compete with Vanta and Drata on automation. It focuses on governance, documentation, workflows, and ISO 27001. It is effectively the gold standard for documentation-heavy compliance programs.
Where ISMS.online shines
Where ISMS.online falls short
ISMS.online excels only when ISO governance is the objective and manual workflows are acceptable.
Vanta's automation is strong enough for startups with simple cloud stacks.
Pros
• Plug and play integration
• Good for GWS, Okta, AWS, Azure
• Enough automation to satisfy SOC 2
Cons
• Does not validate deep context
• Cloud misconfiguration coverage shallow
• Evidence accuracy inconsistent
Vanta wins in ease, not depth.
Drata's automation is the strongest in this comparison.
Strengths
• Accurate identity validation
• Deep cloud checks
• Real-time monitoring
• Custom rules
• Better evidence linking
Tradeoffs
• Requires engineering involvement
• Slower onboarding
• More complex to operate
Drata automation is best for scaling teams and multi-cloud setups.
ISMS.online intentionally avoids deep automation.
Why
Because it focuses on governance, not engineering.
Result
• More manual work
• More spreadsheets
• More checklists
• Less real-time monitoring
ISMS.online is not built for automation-centric teams.
Fast, beginner-friendly, cost-effective for small teams.
More technical, better for scaling teams and multi-framework.
Functional but not competitive for engineering-driven companies.
Winner: Drata for technical depth, Vanta for early-stage speed.

Enter your email to receive a free ISO 27001 checklist and start your compliance journey today.
Good starting templates but lacks strong governance structure.
Better mapping across controls but still engineering-first.
This is where ISMS.online dominates entirely. It was designed for:
Winner: ISMS.online without question.
Evidence sometimes needs manual correction.
Best evidence accuracy.
Mostly manual uploads.
Winner: Drata.
Basic and simplified.
Moderate depth and good for growing teams.
Strongest governance but manual.
Winner: Depends on use case
• Governance heavy team: ISMS.online
• Technical team: Drata
• Startup: Vanta
| Platform | Price for small teams | Price at scale | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanta | Medium | Very high | Add-ons quickly increase cost |
| Drata | High | Very high | Costly for multi-framework expansion |
| ISMS.online | Medium | Predictable | Requires consultants for acceleration |
Vanta
Drata
ISMS.online
There is no universal winner between Vanta, Drata, and ISMS.online. Each is built with a different philosophy.
Vanta wins speed
Drata wins automation
ISMS.online wins governance
But none of them solve the biggest problems startups in APAC face:
This is the gap Smartly was built to close.
Smartly gives startups what these global platforms cannot.
Smartly delivers:
Full ISO 27001 certification readiness in 15 to 30 days
Unlimited real human support in APAC time zones
Policies, controls, risk templates, and evidence packs
A compliance program built specifically for early-stage and mid-stage teams
Predictable pricing with the audit included
Smartly is not just a tool. It is a guided path to certification.
Where Vanta offers automation, Drata offers precision, and ISMS.online offers structure, Smartly delivers one thing none of them guarantee.
Certification. Fast. With expert hands-on support.